A world-renowned economist was left stunned when he realized that President Donald Trump used his research to leverage his lofty worldwide tariffs – and claimed the administration grossly overcalculated how much each country owes.

University of Chicago Economics Professor Brent Neiman, a Biden-era Treasury official, said he was confused when the president held up his sign showing the amount of tariffs he would impose on 60 countries last Wednesday in what Trump dubbed Liberation Day.

‘My first question, when the White House unveiled its tariff regime was: How on Earth did they calculate such huge rates?’ he wrote in an op-ed for the New York Times.

Prof Neiman – who has prestigious degrees from Harvard, Oxford, and UPenn – had his question answered the next day, when he realized that the ordeal was ‘personal.’

‘The Office of the US Trade Representative released its methodology and cited an academic paper produced by four economists, including me, seemingly in support of their numbers,’ he said.

‘But they got it wrong. Very wrong.’

Trump’s 10 per cent ‘baseline’ tariff began Saturday, hitting all US imports except goods from Mexico and Canada. Further tariffs on goods from 57 trading partners, including the European Union and China, are set to go into effect on Wednesday.

The tariffs have triggered market meltdowns across the globe – sparking calls from his billionaire allies, including Elon Musk and Bill Ackman, to rethink the strategy.

University of Chicago Economics Professor Brent Neiman was left stunned when he learned the Trump administration invoked his research to leverage his lofty worldwide tariffs

Neiman explained that the Trump administration erroneously added a 25 per cent rate to the formula Neiman and his colleagues had created – meaning that the tariff rates Trump imposed should all be four times less.

‘Where does 25 per cent come from?’ Neiman asked, rhetorically. ‘Is it related to our work? I don’t know.’

‘Our findings suggest the calculated tariffs should be dramatically smaller – perhaps one-fourth as large.’

Neiman also hit out at the president for leveraging the ‘reciprocal tariffs’ in an effort to end trade deficits with the country’s major trading partners.

‘Is this a reasonable goal? It is not,’ he declared in his op-ed, arguing that trade balances are unavoidable and natural.

‘Americans spend more on clothing made in Sri Lanka than Sri Lankans spend on American pharmaceuticals and gas turbines. So what?’ he explained.

‘Not every country has similar natural resources or development levels,’ Neiman continued. ‘The deficit numbers don’t suggest, let alone prove, unfair competition.’

The economist also quoted Nobel laureate Robert Solow to explain his reasoning. Solow had once said, ‘I have a chronic deficit with my barber, who doesn’t buy a darned thing from me.’

‘Mr. Solow also surely ran a chronic surplus with his students and these imbalances reveal nothing about trade barriers in haircare or higher education, nor would they speak to his financial health.’

Neiman concluded by saying Trump’s tariffs ‘have enormous implications for workers, firms, consumers and stock markets around the globe’ and warned that they will ‘bring average tariff rates to their highest level in 100 years.

‘And despite being billed as a “do unto others” trade policy, they are not calculated in line with the Bible’s golden rule,’ the economist noted, saying foreign tariffs on American goods are nowhere near the levels Trump is pushing.

Neiman claimed the Trump administration erroneously added a 25 per cent rate into its calculations – meaning that all of the tariffs imposed on countries across the world are four times higher than they should be

He said by saying he wants Trump’s tariffs policy and methodology to be scrapped entirely.

Barring that, he said, ‘the administration should divide its results by four.’

On Monday, European stocks suffered their worst one-day fall since the start of the COVID pandemic and Japan’s benchmark Nikkei 225 index closed nearly 8 per cent lower than on Friday, while the broader Topix finished down 7.7 per cent.

Economists across the world now worry about a global economic downturn, with betting markets now showing a 62 per cent chance that the U.S. will plunge into a recession this year.

The odds of such an economic drop spiked when Trump announced the tariffs last Wednesday – when the odds of a recession went from 39 per cent to 49 per cent, according to Polymarket.

And on Sunday the chances reached a high of 66 per cent, showing a whopping two in three chances that a recession is nearing.

 

Economists across the world now worry of a global economic downturn

Many world leaders have now come to the negotiating table, with European Union officials announcing Monday that they have proposed a ‘zero-zero’ tariff deal in which neither the United States nor the Eurozone would leverage the fines on industrial goods.

Under the European Union’s deal, cars and other goods – including chemicals, pharmaceuticals, rubber and plastic machinery – would not face tariffs in the United States or in any of the Eurozone countries, according to Politico.

The idea had been backed by DOGE Chief Elon Musk, who told a political rally last week that he hopes to see a ‘zero tariff situation’ between the US and Europe to create a free trade zone.

Shark Tank star Kevin O’Leary pushed the president to take the deal – which he called an ‘off-ramp.’

He claimed it would be a win for the United States as the Eurozone charges a tariff of 10 per cent on imported American vehicles – largely preventing them from entering the European markets.

At the same time, Volkswagen announced on Monday that Audi is holding its cars at US ports – preventing them from entering the US market.

Trump says ‘every country wants to negotiate’ with the US

Yet Trump has remained firm, telling reporters that he is ‘not looking at’ pausing any of the reciprocal tariffs despite a now-debunked report he was considering a 90-day halt.

‘We have been ripped off and taken advantage of by many countries over the years and can’t do it anymore. We just can’t do it anymore. We can’t be the stupid people anymore,’ Trump told reporters.

He also argued that the European Union’s offer was not enough to get him to reverse his 20 per cent tariffs on the 27-state bloc.

‘The EU has been very tough over the years,’ he said. ‘It was formed to really do damage to the United States in trade.

‘They don’t take our cars – like Japan in that sense,’ the president continued. ‘They don’t take our agricultural product; they don’t take anything practically.’

Trump also threatened to increase the tariffs on China – after Beijing retaliated against the US president with an import levy of 34 per cent.

Trump vowed to hit the Chinese with another 50 per cent unless they remove theirs by Tuesday.

‘If China does not withdraw its 34% increase above their already long term trading abuses by tomorrow, April 8th, 2025, the United States will impose ADDITIONAL Tariffs on China of 50 per cent effective April 9th,’ Trump wrote on his Truth Social account.

The president also warned that negotiations and trade talks with China would be canceled if they refused to back down.

‘Additionally, all talks with China concerning their requested meetings with us will be terminated!’ he wrote.

Trump allies Bill Ackman and JPMorgan Chase Jamie Dimon have spoken out against the tariffs

MAGA ally Ben Shapiro has stunningly turned on President Trump and urged him to listen to Elon Musk ‘s criticism of his tariff policy

But Trump’s strong stance has apparently angered some of his allies, including Musk and billionaire Bill Ackman.

Ben Shapiro, a long-time supporter of the president, also smashed the illusion that tariffs are a good business deal for Americans to smithereens, with a startling insight on Monday: ‘Musk is right. Musk happens to be 100 per cent right about this.’

Jamie Dimon, the CEO of JPMorgan Chase, similarly used his shareholder letter to warn that Trump’s levies would result in ‘inflationary outcome’ both on imports and prices in the United States.

‘The recent tariffs will likely increase inflation and are causing many to consider a greater probability of a recession,’ he told shareholders, according to the Washington Post. 

Some Republican senators have also voiced their support for a measure that would require the president to inform Congress of upcoming tariffs within 48 hours of them being implemented.

It would also mandate that the tariffs need approval from Congress within 60 days of them being imposed and that Congress could end any tariff at any time.

Meanwhile, a libertarian group funded by Leonardo Leo and Charles Koch has launched a legal challenge against Trump’s tariffs, The Guardian reports. 

The New Civil Liberties alliance filed the suit to prevent Trump from imposing tariffs on imports from China, arguing that doing so under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act is unlawful.

It was filed on behalf of Simplified, a Florida-based home goods company whose business is heavily reliant on imports from China.

The suit argues that the president exceeded his powers in invoking the IEEPA to justify its tariffs.

Trump has remained firm, telling reporters that he is ‘not looking at’ pausing any of the reciprocal tariffs despite a now-debunked report he was considering a 90-day halt

Note: we are republishing this story which originally made the news in November 2013.

When Adric White broke into and entered a Family Dollar, he drew his gun and demanded that the cashier hand over all the cash. White, 18, thought he knew what he was doing when he held the employees hostage at gunpoint. He ordered them around, acting like a big shot, making demands and feeling strong when they were carried out; however, things took a twist when a Good Samaritan with a legal concealed-carry license busted out their gun and turned the tables on the young armed robber.

When the Good Samaritan came to the scene, he pointed his weapon at White and told the young man not to move. But White was not about to have his glory stolen from him that easily. Instead of listening, he whipped around to look at the Good Samaritan. Because the man with the gun had warned the robber not to move, White got filled with five bullets, which took him out and allowed others to restrain him and get his gun away from him.

While Adric White survived the shooting with five gunshot wounds, his ego took the biggest beating. He was treated at the hospital and subsequently charged with armed robbery. When his family learned about what was happening, they threw a fit – they could not believe how it was acceptable for the man with his concealed carry license to shoot White. They wanted to know why the police had not arrested him.

The family argued that the man should not have shot White. He should have simply turned around and not gotten involved in the situation. While it was admittedly risky for the Good Samaritan to pull his gun and take part in the robbery, trying to stop it, he got involved and then fired five shots when he felt threatened by White.

Because the Good Samaritan felt threatened by White and his weapon, he took the shots. And because White was waving his gun around, pointing it at the employees and threatening their lives if he did not get what he wanted from the store, it was deemed reasonable that the bystander would stand up and try to save the people who were at risk. White and his family had no real reason to back up their statement. They just didn’t like the fact that White’s plans were thwarted and he did not get away without a few bullet wounds.